next »

[jelv1]

The queue graphs look OK but:

Code:

Delivery-date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:23:52 +0000
Received: from bbs.adslguide.org.uk ([80.249.99.126])
  by pih-sunmxcore14.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1HofoN-0004l6-MO
  for xxx@yyy.plus.com; Thu, 17 May 2007 13:14:31 +0000
Received: from apacheby bbs.adslguide.org.uk with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Hofli-0006E1-Lc
for xxx@yyy.plus.com; Thu, 17 May 2007 14:11:46 +0100

[Tam]

The queue graphs look OK but:

Code:

Delivery-date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:23:52 +0000
Received: from bbs.adslguide.org.uk ([80.249.99.126])
  by pih-sunmxcore14.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1HofoN-0004l6-MO
  for xxx@yyy.plus.com; Thu, 17 May 2007 13:14:31 +0000
Received: from apacheby bbs.adslguide.org.uk with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Hofli-0006E1-Lc
for xxx@yyy.plus.com; Thu, 17 May 2007 14:11:46 +0100

Amazing how you can get graphs to display just the good stuff isn't it

[MauriceB]

And one more:

Code:

X-Daemon-Classification: INNOCENT
Envelope-to: *****@the****st.plus.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 May 2007 06:49:00 +0000
Received: from outbound.alamo.os-0.com ([64.75.7.32])
  by pih-sunmxcore16.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1HoL6r-0003DP-1e
  for *****@the*****st.plus.com; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:08:14 +0000
Message-ID: <78.17206.57044058.168088578.2@alamo.os-0.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alamo Rent A Car <Alamo@alamo.com>
Reply-To: Alamo Rent A Car <replies_alamo_nl02@smtp.alamo.os-0.com>
To: *****@the*****st.plus.com
Subject: Alamo.com Member Hot Deals!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_9140867_301276569.1179328131241"
X-campaignid: OSE 17206
Resent-Sender: ose@smtp.alamo.os-0.com
X-PN-VirusFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v4.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu May 17 06:49:03 2007
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5508
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 124 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27,
Delivery-date*May, 0.00094,
Delivery-date*Thu+17, 0.00203,
Url*D, 0.00291,
5+Day, 0.99687,
5+Day, 0.99687,
Delivery-date*May+2007, 0.00388,
369, 0.00457,
284, 0.00501,
Received*May+2007, 0.00517,
Date*May+2007, 0.00648,
between+9, 0.00836,
between+9, 0.00836,
for+Pre, 0.00909,
for+Pre, 0.00909,
sold+or, 0.99000,
sold+or, 0.99000,
Pay+is, 0.99000,
Pay+is, 0.99000,
In+is, 0.99000,
In+is, 0.99000,
66", 0.01000,
shape="rect"+coords="254, 0.01000,
some+on, 0.01000,
some+on, 0.01000,
sans+serif">San, 0.01000,
serif">Los, 0.01000,
Plan+your, 0.01000

[lmartin]

We did see some fairly big spikes (in terms of current queue performance) yesterday.  Most probably related to the email send currently ongoing.  Those are now coming back down to normal levels though.

If you see anything further, let us know, but that is probably the cause of the delays yesterday.

[wildmind]

Any reason the graphs didn't show the peaks?

[MauriceB]

If you see anything further, let us know, but that is probably the cause of the delays yesterday.

Is this an answer - or just a confident "maybe"  Liam?

[Mark Kelly]

Definative answer guys.

A small amount of mail got "stuck" in the Av filter on MXCore 14.

This was spotted by one of the networks engineers who killed the process and relauched the mail queue of the stuck messages.

From what I can see of the graphs, this is shown, unless I am losing it totally, which after this week wouldnt be too hard

[ianwild]

I see spiky graphness too:



What are we missing?

Ian

[godsell4]

... mail got "stuck" in the Av filter on MXCore 14.

The message to jelv did go via mxcore14, the message to MauriceB was on mxcore 16.

SW.